By Jane M. Ussher
Managing the colossal Feminine takes a distinct method of the research of the cloth and discursive practices linked to the development and law of the feminine physique. Jane Ussher examines the ways that medication, technological know-how, the legislations and pop culture mix to supply fictions approximately femininity, positioning the reproductive physique because the resource of women's strength, chance and weakness.
Including sections on 'regulation', 'the subjectification of ladies' and 'women's negotiation and resistance', this ebook describes the development of the 'monstrous female' in mythology, paintings, literature and picture, revealing its implications for the legislation and adventure of the fecund girl physique. severe stories are mixed with case experiences and broad interview fabric to light up discussions of topics including:
- the law of girls throughout the body
- regimes of information linked to reproduction
- intersubjectivity and the body
- women’s narratives of resistance.
These insights into the relation among the development of the feminine physique and women's subjectivity might be of curiosity to these learning well-being psychology, social psychology, scientific sociology, gender reports and cultural reviews. The ebook also will attract all these trying to find a high-level creation to modern feminist notion at the woman body.
Read Online or Download Managing the Monstrous Feminine: Regulating the Reproductive Body PDF
Similar psychology & counseling books
The criminal procedure calls for psychological well-being pros to supply learn summaries to help their reviews in baby custody instances. Contributions from prime developmental researchers, lawyers, and clinicians describe how medical facts is correctly utilized in court docket. well timed and present, this ebook is helping evaluators entry the simplest info to satisfy their tasks to their consumers and the court docket.
Dr. Hersen has amassed during this unparalleled 4-volume paintings the prime resaerchers and clinicians in mental evaluation. This groundbreaking reference provides crucial details at the 4 significant sessions of mental evaluate tools, together with intelligence/neuropsychological, character (both aim and projective), behavioral, and industrial/organizational.
Additional resources for Managing the Monstrous Feminine: Regulating the Reproductive Body
Indeed, subsequent empirical research has demonstrated that women perform no differently, or even better, premenstrually ; they have fewer accidents in the premenstrual phase of the cycle ; and women are far less likely to crash a car than men, regardless of whether they are premenstrual or not. However, this doesn’t stop self-help books from proclaiming: the best ways of travelling to work if you are suffering from premenstrual symptoms are either to walk, if it’s not too far, or to obtain a lift.
Journal  Plato and Hippocrates may have warned of the danger of the ‘wandering womb’, and nineteenth-century psychiatrists positioned menstruation as a source of ‘moral and physical derangement’ [24, p. 88]; however, the focus on the premenstrual phase of the cycle as a time of vulnerability, and on premenstrual changes as symptoms of psychiatric illness, can be traced to 1931, when the diagnostic category ‘premenstrual tension’ (PMT) was first described. Robert Frank, the gynaecologist commonly credited with establishing the existence of PMT, attributed the combination of physical and psychological symptoms he observed occurring in the days immediately prior to menstruation to accumulations of ‘the female sex hormone’, oestrogen .
These supposedly ‘objective’ measurement indices provide a framework within which women come to understand certain psychological or bodily experiences as pathological ‘symptoms’ deserving of professional intervention. And because ‘symptoms’ are framed as ‘PMS’, women are encouraged to attribute distress to the reproductive body. There is no room within this model for examination of the complexity of a woman’s subjective premenstrual experience—it has to be rated on a scale of one to five, as occurring or not occurring, with no contextual information about how, why, when, and for how long this ‘symptom’ was experienced.