Housing Adventure: Inspection Report
Time to discuss last week’s inspection. Obviously, it wasn’t simple, otherwise I would have said “things look great!” and moved on. While the following faults are not necessarily minor, both the inspector and we agree that it is a great old house.
First, the biggest issue is some unexplained shifting obvious in the second floor interior. Old houses settle and shift over time but this isn’t “old sag.” This is clearly recent and active shifting and we don’t know what is causing it. There is no access to the foundation under the addition and that limits our ability to get a better look. What confuses us even more, evidence is only visible on the second floor, no visible indicators on the first floor interior or in the attic and the exterior looks great (well 100-years-old kind of great). So, we don’t know what is going on, but we’re concerned. Do we think it is going to fall over anytime soon? Not at all. But it is something that could cost a considerable amount of cash to fix in the near (within 5 years) future. Strike One.
Second is another structural issue that is low on our priority list, yet high on our response list. There is a newer exterior chimney, probably new within the last several years, that is moving away from the house. Obviously bad news for the chimney and the foundation but it is something that we can clearly point at and say “look! problem!”. But, it isn’t high on our priority list because the broiler has only a few more years left in it and then we would replace it with another heating system that doesn’t need the chimney. So, we want them to pay for a chimney replacement (replacement is the only option at this point) and we’ll hold out another year or so and take it down and the boiler out. In the mean time, we’ll do what we can to ensure no further shifting, that there are no cracks in the chimney liner, and that it doesn’t take out the side of the house or any parked cars. Strike two.
The first two structural issues are not related, at least not obviously. The first issues affects the addition that was added to the house at some point in time. The chimney is attached to the original part of the structure and that part isn’t going anywhere. The primary structure has the heftiest, thickest, and most close-set support timbers I’ve ever seen and a stone foundation that goes down a good 6 feet. That portion is sturdy, but the other part? We don’t know.
There are a bunch of other little things that add up as well: repair a post and bean in the basement that is deteriorating, replace all rotted exterior wood (fascia, soffits, etc.), sand, prime, caulk, and paint exterior, replace side entry roof, repair and clean all gutters, get the kitchen drain working properly.
We’ve made up a price list of the repairs — all numbers are pretty much pulled out of the air.
- Shifting Addition: unknown, $30,000+
- Replace Chimney: $8,000
- Replace post and beam: $500
- Fix drain in kitchen: $300
- Paint Exterior (replace rotted boards): $2,000
- Replace side entry roof: $2,000
- Replace broken windows: $500
- Repair and clean gutters: $500
- Total: $43,800
Our first round of negotiations is to tell them to fix everything. Seeing as this is an “as-is” sale, that isn’t going to happen. Our agent was talking about us getting more cash back at settlement, but we don’t think that’ll work cause our lending agency wouldn’t like it and we don’t want that cash going straight to a contractor. What we want is a reduction in price, even if it means it only saves us a couple dollars a month — that’s a couple of dollars that could be going to principal.
Do I think we’ll get a 40K reduction in price, not at all, but I will be pushing pretty hard on the structural stuff because we don’t know what is going on. That alone means that 30K could be a drop in the bucket to the reality of the situation. Or, it could be what we think it is and the cleaning the gutters an rerouting water will help solve the problem — when you don’t know, you don’t estimate low and hope that you’re right. For now, I’ll assume that we need to replace every single joist-timber under the addition (which would be way more than 30K, I’m sure).
To clarify, we don’t think the house is in serious trouble and our inspector didn’t either, but it is indeed a bargaining chip. We’ve set up a time for a structural engineer to take a look, but we feel she may not be able to tell us much more than we already know because we don’t have access to the foundation under the addition. When we buy the place, we’ll be fixing the grading and redirecting water that is probably not helping the situation. In the mean time, we’ll see what we can do to drop the price of the house somewhat.
Next steps: wait for the seller’s response to our request to fix everything and see what this week’s termite inspection says – maybe that’ll throw in another bargaining chip as they are required to spend up to $5,000 to fix any problems found. However, I’m hoping that nothing is found in terms of termites.
Lisa
April 24th, 2007 21:32
I live in southern maryland. I’m seeing alot more properties on the the market. It was hard for a while to find properties in the lower brackets. Finally, there are plenty. Hold strong, you have options. Prices are dropping and your sellers must know that. Be very careful about purchasing a home with structural issues. You don’t need the hassle (or safety issues) of a money pit. Have faith and patience!
george rotramel
April 24th, 2007 23:25
Hi,
I’m an entomologist who does forensic work in termite damage cases. I’ve also spent 20 years testing and developing termiticides in industry, including testing the first IGR termite bait (commercial baits use this chemistry). Anyway, my routine web search program kicked up your situation, and here is a suggestion.
In addition to getting a termite inspection, find out who has had the house under contract for termite inspection/control, and ask to see the inspection and treatment records. I’ve had a couple of cases in MD recently and a house as old as this should have been treated for termites at some time in the past and should definitely be under contract for termites now.
So get the records and have your termite inspector or some other knowledgeable party other than the company that holds the current contract review them and tell you what they mean.
In your area, you should not assume ANYTHING where termites are concerned. Get the termite history of the structure up front.
Regards,
George Rotramel, PhD
Finding Balance
April 25th, 2007 10:27
As I was reading your post, I was thinking: “structural engineer, structural engineer”. I’m glad to see you are planning to hire one.
Personally I think I would have walked away at this point, but that’s me and I haven’t seen the house. :)
Donna Jean
April 25th, 2007 17:58
Thanks for the feedback. We’re certainly waiting on the repair negotiations and the structural engineer report. If things are icky, I’m game with walking away. However, no matter how “good” the market has been, what we want in our price range is few and far between. Sure, we can find something in our range, but thats not quite the point. Thankfully, I’m still not in-love with this house, so it won’t take a whole lot to move me one way or another on buying it.
George – there is evidence of termite treatment, I’ll follow up to find out about the termite service contract and previous work was/is.